Hollyland Lark M1 vs Rode Wireless Go 2
Elisabeth Christ
Updated November 2024
Wireless microphones are revolutionizing audio recording for content creators, vloggers, and filmmakers. Among the top contenders, the Hollyland Lark M1 and Rode Wireless Go 2 stand out for their compact designs and cutting-edge features. This article dives deep into their design, audio performance, smart features, and battery life. By the end, you'll discover which one suits your recording needs best.
Key Takeaways
The Hollyland Lark M1 prioritizes simplicity and affordability with clear, warm audio and a user-friendly app, while the Rode Wireless Go 2 delivers professional versatility with advanced customization and onboard recording capabilities. Both excel in compact design, dependable battery life, and broad compatibility.
Hollyland Lark M1
Compact Wireless Lavalier Microphone with Balanced Quality Features
✓ Zippered carrying case & furry windshields
✓ 20Hz~20KHz Frequency Range
✓ Hi-Fi Sound Quality
✓ 200m Transmission LOS
Rode Wireless Go 2
Highly Versatile Dual-Channel Wireless Microphone
✓ 200m Transmission
✓ On-board recording
✓ 3.5mm TRS analog output
✓ Safety channel feature
#1 Design & Kit
Hollyland Lark M1 vs Rode Wireless Go 2
Compactness and portability define both the Hollyland Lark M1 and Rode Wireless Go 2, yet their aesthetics and functional designs bring unique touches. The Lark M1 adopts an ultra-mini charging and storage design, coupled with an ergonomic matte finish, ensuring effortless portability and style. Its LED indicators and zippered carrying case enhance usability. Rode’s setup balances practicality with sophistication, integrating tiny transmitter and receiver units with functional LED panels and robust clip mounts for quick attachment, a bonus for dynamic shoots.
Both kits cater to user convenience, but their extras reveal distinctions. The Lark M1 includes furry windshields and auto power features, creating a ready-to-go vibe. Meanwhile, Rode ups the ante with a vibrant display on its receiver and customizable recording modes.
#2 Audio Quality
Rode Wireless Go 2
Audio clarity and fidelity stand tall for both mics, though their sound profiles reflect distinct priorities. The Lark M1 emphasizes warmth and vibrancy, leveraging Hi-Fi sound capabilities and HearClear noise cancellation. Its omnidirectional pickup and 48kHz/16-bit sampling excel in capturing crisp, natural tones. Rode counters with a broader frequency range (50Hz-20kHz) and advanced Series IV 2.4GHz transmission for consistent clarity even in challenging environments.
Hollyland Lark M1
Customization sets them apart: the Lark M1 features straightforward 3-level volume presets, while Rode delivers meticulous gain control through its app, enabling fine-tuning in 3dB increments. Whether it’s the dynamic liveliness of the Lark or the professional refinement of Rode, both shine in capturing studio-quality audio tailored to their audiences.
#3 Smart Features on Companion App
Rode Wireless Go 2
Modern connectivity options enhance the smartness of both devices. The Lark M1's companion app offers essential features, such as mono/stereo modes and intuitive noise cancellation toggles, ensuring easy adaptability for everyday use. Rode, however, takes an advanced approach, providing deeper audio adjustments via its Rode Central app, such as enabling onboard recording and switching between compressed and uncompressed audio.
Hollyland Lark M1
While the Lark M1 app focuses on simplifying audio tweaks, Rode’s software delves into professional-grade options, including fine gain control, Always Record mode, and customizable button functions.
#4 Battery Life & Connectivity
Rode Wireless Go 2
Long-lasting battery life keeps both mics dependable during extended use. The Lark M1 boasts up to 8 hours of runtime per unit, supplemented by its charging case for an additional two full charges. Rode’s system offers 7 hours per charge, with the case providing up to 21 hours total, ensuring users remain powered through demanding shoots.
In terms of connectivity, both integrate USB-C and 3.5mm ports, but Rode introduces an onboard recorder capable of storing up to 40 hours of audio, elevating its utility for backup needs. The Lark M1’s versatility with TRS and optional USB-C/Lightning cables ensures broad device compatibility, whereas Rode prioritizes high-fidelity connections through robust 128-bit encryption.
Hollyland Lark M1 vs Rode Wireless Go 2
Final Thoughts
Hollyland Lark M1 vs Rode Wireless Go 2
Choosing between the Hollyland Lark M1 and Rode Wireless Go 2 depends on your priorities. The Lark M1 shines for its affordability and straightforward functionality, ideal for casual creators. Rode’s robust customization and professional-grade features cater to those seeking precise control. Both options are stellar in their domains, ensuring reliable and high-quality recording for any project.
If you like to read more about Wireless Microphone, check out our other relevant guides here:
Rode Wireless Go vs Go 2
DJI Mic vs Rode Wireless Go 2
Best Wireless Microphone (2024)
DJI Mic 2 vs Hollyland Lark M2
DJI Mic 2 vs Rode Wireless Go II
DJI Mic 2 vs Rode Wireless Pro
DJI Mic 2 vs DJI Mic
Author
Elisabeth Christ
Don't miss out on tech
Subscribe to our newsletter to stay up to date on the latest tech trends and guides on the best gadgets around.
